Plato Among and Against the Post-Modernists
نویسنده
چکیده
that directs and is the cause of everything.” [1] With moments to expire before Athens would execute him, Plato’s Socrates was exploring the meaning of a few lines by another philosopher. To the last minute of Socrates’ dramatic life, Plato has him making important criticism on vital literary texts. Textual criticism is found throughout Plato’s works, making it his main philosophical methodology. His literary approach destroys the image of Plato as a logician working systematically from proven axioms or definitions toward a conclusion. In fact, Plato never makes a systematic exposition of just one philosophical issue, nor moves from a stated central topic or thesis to work out the numerous details, as Aristotle would do shortly thereafter. Plato’s selective, spontaneous, and unsystematic approach links him with a much later tradition: post-modernism. The purposes of this paper are two: to establish that Plato’s productive methodology was literary criticism; and to explore the implications of the postmodern revival of Plato’s approach.
منابع مشابه
Paradox and Relativism
Since the time of Plato, relativism has been attacked as a self-refuting theory. Today, there are two basic kinds of argument that are used to show that global relativism is logically incoherent: first, a direct descendent of the argument Plato uses against Protagoras, called the peritrope; and, second, a more recent argument that relativism leads to an infinite regress. Although some relativis...
متن کاملThat Philosophy as Epistemological-Based is Not Debased: A Critique of Post-Modernist/Hermeneutic Critique of Traditional Philosophy
Over the centuries, beginning with the classic Greeks through the trends of the mid-20th century, philosophical enterprise has been intricately and seemingly irretrievably rooted in the theory of the given—an edification of philosophy as that giant mirror and standard for measuring what counts as knowledge; but is it thus synonymous with or reducible to epistemology? How or why? There are two a...
متن کاملThe Moral Virtue of Tolerance and Its Relationship in Liberalism and Religious Modernism in Iran
Background: Gentleness, ease and compromise with others cause the proper development of human emotions and in religious texts it is referred to as "tolerance". This moral virtue has a high importance and position among different schools and religious teachings, so the main question in this study was how the relationship between the moral virtues of tolerance in the school of liberalism with thi...
متن کاملHappiness in Plato’s Theory of Philosopher- King
Plato in Theory of Philosopher-King believes that all of the members of ideal city-state, whether ruler or citizens, will attain happiness if the philosopher is the ruler. But there are paradoxes in the theory and the bases of the happiness are unstable too. In other words, Plato in his theory presents hierarchical dualities (Intelligible/Visible world, Episteme/ Doxa,True/ Untrue Or Shadow, …)...
متن کامل